…and here is the list of movies:
100. Night of the Living Dead
99. Laura
98. Dead Poet’s Society
97. Bladerunner
96. The Lost Weekend
95. Ocean’s 11
94. Star Wars Continue reading ‘100 Movies, 100 Quotes and (more than) 100 Numbers’
random thoughts about some of your surface world culture.
…and here is the list of movies:
100. Night of the Living Dead
99. Laura
98. Dead Poet’s Society
97. Bladerunner
96. The Lost Weekend
95. Ocean’s 11
94. Star Wars Continue reading ‘100 Movies, 100 Quotes and (more than) 100 Numbers’
I have no words to describe how the death of OiNK makes me feel, so I will share what some others have said:
Paraphrased Wikipedia: Copyright agencies described Oink as an online pirate pre-release music club; former users described it as one of the world’s largest and most meticulously maintained online music repositories. There were around 180,000 members at the time of closure and all of their avatars had to be cute.
“If you’re not familiar with Oink, here’s a quick summary: Oink was was a free members-only site – to join it you had to be invited by a member. Members had access to an unprecedented community-driven database of music. Every album you could ever imagine was just one click away.”
[Read the rest on: When Pigs Fly: The Death of Oink, the Birth of Dissent, and a Brief History of Record Industry Suicide.]
…and it wasn’t just me:
What do you think about OiNK being shut down?
Trent Reznor: I’ll admit I had an account there and frequented it quite often. At the end of the day, what made OiNK a great place was that it was like the world’s greatest record store. Pretty much anything you could ever imagine, it was there, and it was there in the format you wanted. If OiNK cost anything, I would certainly have paid, but there isn’t the equivalent of that in the retail space right now. iTunes kind of feels like Sam Goody to me. I don’t feel cool when I go there. I’m tired of seeing John Mayer’s face pop up. I feel like I’m being hustled when I visit there, and I don’t think their product is that great. DRM, low bit rate, etc. Amazon has potential, but none of them get around the issue of pre-release leaks. And that’s what’s such a difficult puzzle at the moment. If your favorite band in the world has a leaked record out, do you listen to it or do you not listen to it? People on those boards, they’re grateful for the person that uploaded it — they’re the hero. They’re not stealing it because they’re going to make money off of it; they’re stealing it because they love the band. I’m not saying that I think OiNK is morally correct, but I do know that it existed because it filled a void of what people want.
[the rest of the interview is on: Trent Reznor and Saul Williams Discuss Their New Collaboration, Mourn OiNK]
How one Walt Disney Cartoon was made:
(Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs behind-the-scenes)
Here are a couple quotes from the documentary:
“…the thousands of pencil drawings go to the inking department. Here, hundreds of pretty girls…”
“The inked celluloids next go to the painting department where more pretty girls apply the final colors.”
Damn…Walt Disney was a bigger genius than I ever realized. Unfortunately, to some degree, we also have the Disney Company to thank for possibly being detrimental to cultural diversity. One can argue that a rich, continually replenished, public domain is necessary for continued artistic creation. Disney as we know it wouldn’t exist if the current copyright laws were in place years ago because many of Disney’s animated films are based on Nineteenth Century public domain works, including Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Cinderella, Pinocchio, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Alice in Wonderland, and The Jungle Book.
There has never been a time in history when more of our ‘culture’ was as ‘owned’ as it is now. And yet there has never been a time when the concentration of power to control the uses of culture has been as unquestioningly accepted as it is now. (pg. 28 of Free Culture)
Free Culture is a book about the social dimension of creativity: how creative work builds on the past and how society encourages or inhibits that building with laws and technologies.

get a digital copy of the book for free
And here’s a humorous, yet informative, review of copyright principles delivered through the words of the very folks we can thank for nearly endless copyright terms:
A Fair(y) Use Tale
the work that must have gone into this…woah.
My new work schedule doesn’t allow me much time for updates at the moment, so I thought I would share something that will help you pass the time between posts.
I first encountered this game on 30 Rock so I will mention their version first:

the 30 Rock game (and the original clip)
Watch the clip, but don’t expect much from the game. The choices are too limited and unfairly balanced…although it did seem like a calculated effort.
This one distracted me for a while, but they really need to add more people. It created more groups of three that were tough decisions than any of the other games from the FMK wiki page.
…Hungry like the Wolf, to be exact. The last time he was everything.
Old Spice continues their efforts to make their product cool.
Severance | the Tripper | Shrooms
Psychedelic drugs already have a terrible reputation and it seems like the new trend for horror writers is to make it even worse. It’s bad enough that in some movies the characters hallucinate cartoon birds when they take cocaine, just to use one example. Unrealistic portrayal of drug-use is essentially lying and can only hurt society in the long run. The most dangerous drugs are already legal anyway, and demonizing the drugs that have the most potential to help the people of the world can’t possibly be a good thing. Maybe this is a new tactic in the war on drugs, but hopefully not…since the similarities with Prohibition and the futility of the drug war are apparent even to former narcs and police. (Sorry that I’ve gone a little link crazy with this post, but the topic has been a pet peeve of mine for quite some time now.)
(edit: this seemed too official to pass up-> Was Timothy Leary Right?)
Severance starts out with a harmless enough drug trip, but the fact that horror-type things happen afterwards makes it almost like a Friday the 13th approach to sex…if you know what I mean. I liked the film overall and there was one scene (that they just about ruin in the trailer) involving Laura Harris (from season 2 of 24) with a shotgun that I thought was excellent, but a lot of the rest seemed like stuff I had seen before. The reviewers seem to like it a bit more than I did though: and why did they change the poster?
Okay…I don’t know much about this one except the basic idea that “a Ronald Reagan-obsessed serial killer targets a bunch of hippies who are heading to a weekend-long concert”, but it seems to be continuing the thread I mentioned before. It’s David Arquette’s directorial debut though (and he supposedly did some “research” at Burning Man), so maybe the message won’t be totally counterproductive…and the fact that Jason Mewes is in it gives me even more hope.

Shrooms trailers (russian site)
I know even less about the movie Shrooms, but supposedly “a group of college students encounter tragedy while on hallucinogenic mushrooms” and with a premise like that it’s easy to imagine associations being made between tragedy and mushrooms (and if I’m sure of anything it’s that those two things should never go together.) The tagline, however, is “Get Ready to Get Wasted” and I have to admit…that’s pretty clever.
To continue the drug theme in this post I will leave you with something that I think is completely awesome: Kirsten Dunst believes the world would be a “better place” if more people smoked marijuana. I wish more people in prominent positions around the world had the guts to speak their minds when they disagree with the current system. I’ve already stated that cannabis is not my thing, but I think people should have the option if they want it. Besides…illegalizing nature just doesn’t even make sense.
John Waters | Singer and McQuarrie | TMNT featurette

You might be thinking “who?”, but if you’ve seen Dawn of the Dead (the remake: 77% fresh), Slither (84% fresh) , or even Scooby Doo (I liked it: bite me.) then you know him through his writing. On his mySpace blog he asks a question…and since I was wondering the exact same thing I have copied it here:

This is James Gunn (words in the quotes are his)
…and he has “one question for you guys –
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?
52 million for fucking GHOST RIDER? What are you thinking? Are you all 11 year old boys? Did you not see DAREDEVIL? With what’s going on at the box office lately, I’m going to have to start reading the Goddamn LEFT BEHIND series, because the apocalypse is most certainly coming soon.
Here’s the thing, guys. The critics don’t always get things right. But when the studios don’t screen a movie for critics – especially a big budget one with a major star – it’s a pretty sure sign the movie’s a piece of shit.”
back to my thoughts:
Daredevil (44% fresh) not only destroyed the core idea of the main character, but it also contained pointless, rip-off, unexplainable scenes and was genuinely one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen. Now why would I want to go see Ghost Rider (27% fresh) by the same director? Exactly…I wouldn’t.
…and if you people keep supporting the BAD FILMS the studios are going to keep making BAD FILMS because those are the ones making money. SMARTEN UP, PEOPLE…this is one you should have downloaded.
I’m stealing someone else’s post because I want more people to read it. You might even say that I have to get the message out.

It’s entirely possible that you might recognize this guy (Nathan Fillion) from Serenity, Firefly, Slither, Buffy the Vampire Slayer (maybe) …or that one episode of Lost.
This is from his blog:
“Do you remember the days when watching Cheers, a small peacock icon would appear in the corner of your screen for a quick few seconds, then disappear? The same went for the CBS eye (or meatball, as it was affectionately referred to in the industry), and the ABC ball. Then, slowly, the icons spent more and more time on screen, until they eventually remained throughout your favorite program? There was a brief time when networks were considerate enough to make the icons semi-transparent. But now? I’m watching a wonderful documentary on the construction of Stonehenge and I’m forced to witness the realistic, spinning planet earth labelled DISCOVERY. Completely opaque? TNT? Come on! I know I’m watching TNT- I’m the one who changed the channel. Is this method of advertising proven to get more viewers? Perhaps you could take a poll and ask who is just flippin’ annoyed by it. Maybe this was cool at one time, but in this day of plasma screens and “burn in” dangers, this seems more of a reason NOT to watch your station. You offend me, you networks and cable stations. You push me to watch HBO, where the classy ad folks don’t beat me on the head with logos. But it gets worse. The Closer? I’m so happy for you and your show. I’m so glad you’re still closing. But whilst I’m watching another program altogether you force me to watch you waving a flashlight around and stepping under police tape. You are going to interrupt my entertainment for an ad about the re-run of your finale? Not even a finale- but a re-run! Comedy Central? Your station ID’s used to be funny! USA, your little “Monk adjusts the ad” was cute, but distracting. It makes me resent Monk. Is that what you want? National Geographic- I expect more from you, but you are not above broadcasting the yellow rectangle that represents the magazine. I’M LOOKING AT THAT FOSSIL, AND YOU ARE BLOCKING IT! Entertain me. Educate me. Don’t flog me. I will switch to the station that doesn’t insult me with their pushy ads. Run a commercial, be the network that says, “We won’t do that to you.” I am the consumer. I am all powerful. I am annoyed. Let 2007 be the year of the anti-logo.”
Read the original post on the blog attached to Nathan Fillion’s official MySpace page. And seriously…Let 2007 be the year of the anti-logo. [this entry has been edited.]